What identifiers are now used to avoid ambiguity in scenarios?

The use of scenario name and scope as identifiers to avoid ambiguity is critical in managing and differentiating between various scenarios in a system. The scenario name provides a clear and unique label for each scenario, while the scope defines the boundaries or context within which that scenario is valid. This dual approach helps users quickly identify and distinguish one scenario from another, particularly in complex environments where multiple scenarios may exist simultaneously.

Utilizing the scenario name ensures that each scenario is distinctly recognized, while the scope specifies the conditions or parameters under which that scenario operates. This is especially important in scenarios involving different resources, timeframes, or constraints, preventing any potential confusion among users who may be analyzing or working with these scenarios.

This clarity enhances collaboration and decision-making, as stakeholders can refer to specific scenarios without worrying about misinterpretation or overlap with other scenarios. Thus, the combination of scenario name and scope effectively eliminates ambiguity and streamlines the management of various scenarios within the system.